Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: Minnesota, et al. 910 F.2d 479 (8th Cir. 1990) In that case Planned Parenthood attempted strike unconstitution- the Minne sota Fetal Disposition I Law. Minn. Stat s 145. 1621 (1988) One of the arguments advanced and the tesponse -he Court noted as follows: We also do not accept Planned Parenthood's argu- ment that the statute creates an impermissible psychological burden equating abortion with mu der... Planned Parenthpod' argument that the state conclusion that fetal remains are the equivalent human remains 1 also unavailing. We cannot agree that the Minnesota legislature intended tc convey meann beyond acceptance ot common terns. How ever even assuming this the purpose we ou find invalid pupose state may make value judgement favoring childbirth over abortion. See W ehster 109 S.Ct. at 30 ...
(.png)
